Template:Criticism section: Difference between revisions
en>Sdkb Partial revert of Knowledgekid87: It's important that we give direct guidance to editors who want to know why criticism sections are bad; currently, that exists at WP:Criticism, which is more of an explainer than an opinion essay. It is also linked from the NPOV policy, a good indication of vetting/community buy-in. |
m Text replacement - "Wikipedia[^:]" to "CAPipedia" |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| fix = Please help rewrite or integrate negative information to other sections [[Wikipedia:Consensus|through discussion]] on the [[:{{NAMESPACE}} talk:{{PAGENAME}}|talk page]]. | | fix = Please help rewrite or integrate negative information to other sections [[Wikipedia:Consensus|through discussion]] on the [[:{{NAMESPACE}} talk:{{PAGENAME}}|talk page]]. | ||
| date = {{{date|}}} | | date = {{{date|}}} | ||
| cat = | | cat = CAPipedianeutral point of view disputes | ||
| all = All | | all = All CAPipedianeutral point of view disputes | ||
}}<!--{{Criticism section}} end--> | }}<!--{{Criticism section}} end--> | ||
}}<noinclude> | }}<noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:29, 23 January 2024
 | This article's "criticism" or "controversy" section may compromise the article's neutrality. (December 2024) |
Lua error in Module:Documentation at line 144: message: type error in message cfg.container (string expected, got nil).