Template:Like whom?/doc: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision imported) |
m (Text replacement - "Wikipedia[^:]" to "CAPipedia") |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Use it when no specific examples of identifiable individuals from that group are named who could be used to verify the beliefs attributed to the group. Preferably, the offending statement should be made more specific by identifying particular individuals and then either cited or tagged for needing citation. Similarly, the statement should be deleted if the claim about the group is sufficiently vague as to be unsupportable. | Use it when no specific examples of identifiable individuals from that group are named who could be used to verify the beliefs attributed to the group. Preferably, the offending statement should be made more specific by identifying particular individuals and then either cited or tagged for needing citation. Similarly, the statement should be deleted if the claim about the group is sufficiently vague as to be unsupportable. | ||
Use good judgment when deciding whether greater specificity is actually in the best interests of the article. Words like ''some'' or ''most'' are not banned and can be useful and appropriate. If greater specificity would result in a tedious [[wikt:laundry list|laundry list]] of items with no real importance, then | Use good judgment when deciding whether greater specificity is actually in the best interests of the article. Words like ''some'' or ''most'' are not banned and can be useful and appropriate. If greater specificity would result in a tedious [[wikt:laundry list|laundry list]] of items with no real importance, then CAPipediashould remain concise, even if it means being vague. If the reliable sources are not specific—if the reliable sources say only "Some people..."—then CAPipediamust remain vague. | ||
This tag will categorize tagged articles into [[:Category:Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases]]. This [[Wikipedia:Template messages|template]] is a [[Wikipedia:Self-references to avoid|self-reference]] and is part of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject| | This tag will categorize tagged articles into [[:Category:Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases]]. This [[Wikipedia:Template messages|template]] is a [[Wikipedia:Self-references to avoid|self-reference]] and is part of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject|CAPipediaproject]] rather than the [[encyclopedia|encyclopedic]] content. | ||
==TemplateData== | ==TemplateData== | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
"label": "Month and year", | "label": "Month and year", | ||
"type": "string", | "type": "string", | ||
"autovalue": " | "autovalue": "January 2024", | ||
"suggested": true | "suggested": true | ||
} | } | ||
Latest revision as of 14:59, 23 January 2024
 | This is a documentation subpage for Template:Like whom?. It contains usage information, categories and other content that is not part of the original Template page. |
[[Category:Template documentation pages{{#translation:}}]]
Usage
This tag is for placement after attributions to vague "authorities" such as "serious scholars", "historians", "some researchers", "many scientists", and the like. For example:
| Markup | ...is so regarded among historians{{Like whom?|{{subst:DATE}}}}
|
| Visual replica | ...is so regarded among historians[Like whom?] |
You may use either one of the following formats:
{{Like whom?|{{subst:DATE}}}}
or
{{Like whom?|date=July 2024}}
Use it when no specific examples of identifiable individuals from that group are named who could be used to verify the beliefs attributed to the group. Preferably, the offending statement should be made more specific by identifying particular individuals and then either cited or tagged for needing citation. Similarly, the statement should be deleted if the claim about the group is sufficiently vague as to be unsupportable.
Use good judgment when deciding whether greater specificity is actually in the best interests of the article. Words like some or most are not banned and can be useful and appropriate. If greater specificity would result in a tedious laundry list of items with no real importance, then CAPipediashould remain concise, even if it means being vague. If the reliable sources are not specific—if the reliable sources say only "Some people..."—then CAPipediamust remain vague.
This tag will categorize tagged articles into Category:Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases. This template is a self-reference and is part of the CAPipediaproject rather than the encyclopedic content.
TemplateData
TemplateData for Like whom?
<templatedata> { "params": { "1": { "aliases": [ "reason" ], "label": "Reason", "type": "string" }, "date": { "label": "Month and year", "type": "string", "autovalue": "January 2024", "suggested": true } } } </templatedata>
See also
- {{Peacock}} (message box)
- {{Weasel}} (message box)
- Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup#Neutrality and factual accuracy, including boxes flagging weasel words, as well as inline templates such as {{When}}
