Functional User Group (FUG): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(Updated member list to show change in MAR representative) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| Northeast Region || Lt Col Michael Sperry | | Northeast Region || Lt Col Michael Sperry | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Mid Atlantic Region || | | Mid Atlantic Region || Lt Col Timothy Day | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Great Lakes Region || Lt Col Mike Bodnarik | | Great Lakes Region || Lt Col Mike Bodnarik | ||
Revision as of 15:18, 13 August 2021
Functional User Group (FUG)
The FUG consists of a Chairman and a Representative from each Region
How it works
- The primary responsibility of the FUG to identify, evaluate and assist in the prioritization of field generated requirements based on their functional expertise and broad experience with eServices.
- Help desk tickets for IT enhancements and fixes with viable workarounds are automatically routed to the FUG Chair who will coordinate the group’s evaluation.
- Each request will be evaluated by at least 2 FUG members and discussed during the bi-weekly FUG meeting.
- Recommendations regarding viable project proposals will be provided to the ITSC for scoring and prioritization.
| Region | Name |
|---|---|
| Chair | Lt Col Timothy Medeiros |
| Northeast Region | Lt Col Michael Sperry |
| Mid Atlantic Region | Lt Col Timothy Day |
| Great Lakes Region | Lt Col Mike Bodnarik |
| Southeast Region | Lt Col Joe Knight III |
| North Central Region | Col William E. Kay |
| Southwest Region | Vacant |
| Rocky Mountain Region | Lt Col Kent Hopkins |
| Pacific Region | MSgt Ira Rosenberg |